It's the Home Office - What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

While it is no doubt arguable, at least in theory, that Her Majesty's Government is capable of drafting policies which are neither illegal nor racist, a civil servant should know better than to back a mediocre case with a bad example. Nevertheless, staff at the Home Office expressing concern over the proposed Rwandan refugee gulag have been blustered at in no uncertain terms about not reasoning why. With typical extremism, the Public and Commercial Services union has proclaimed "absolute" opposition to the policy, in telling contrast to the sensible moderation of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition's moderate sensibility, which has merely expressed doubt as to cost-effectiveness. An equally economical line was taken by the permanent secretary, who seems blithely unaware of the evidence, dating back to at least 2016, that the great British taxpayer is prepared to tolerate considerable financial bruising when it comes to showing the wogs what's what. Staff have been reminded that they should be neutral and apolitical after the civilised British manner of Adolf Eichmann, and a spokesbeing at the Ministry for Wog Disposal was extruded to warn that in the National Johnson administration disrespect, rule-breaking and lack of integrity are tolerated only among the higher pay grades.